Counter-Strike 2 639.7K ▲ 32.3%Dota 2 471.8K ▲ 21.1%ROB RUN 337.0K ▲ 30.1%Bongo Cat 164.4K ▲ 7.0%Call of Duty® 139.4K ▲ 10.9%AION 2 137.5K ▲ 17.9%Path of Exile 122.6K ▲ 2145.6%WARDOGS 109.4K ▼ 6.4%PUBG: BATTLEGROUNDS 96.4K ▲ 17.1%Slay the Spire 2 90.4K ▼ 0.9%Team Fortress 2 87.2K ▼ 3.7%Rust 86.4K ▲ 24.3%Counter-Strike 2 639.7K ▲ 32.3%Dota 2 471.8K ▲ 21.1%ROB RUN 337.0K ▲ 30.1%Bongo Cat 164.4K ▲ 7.0%Call of Duty® 139.4K ▲ 10.9%AION 2 137.5K ▲ 17.9%Path of Exile 122.6K ▲ 2145.6%WARDOGS 109.4K ▼ 6.4%PUBG: BATTLEGROUNDS 96.4K ▲ 17.1%Slay the Spire 2 90.4K ▼ 0.9%Team Fortress 2 87.2K ▼ 3.7%Rust 86.4K ▲ 24.3%
Back to trending
Comparison · 2026

Strategic Command WWII: World at War vs Total War: WARHAMMER III

Total War: WARHAMMER III has 632.9x more concurrent players than Strategic Command WWII: World at War right now.

Strategic Command WWII: World at War
Strategic Command WWII: World at War
Strategy
Right now
38
concurrent players
24h change
-30%
vs yesterday
More active
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Strategy
Right now
24.0K
concurrent players
24h change
+28%
vs yesterday

VERDICT

Strategic Command WWII: World at War has 38 concurrent players right now. Total War: WARHAMMER III has 24,049 concurrent players. Over the last 24 hours, Strategic Command WWII: World at War is down 30% and Total War: WARHAMMER III is up 28%. Total War: WARHAMMER III is the more active title right now. Both games still have living audiences; the gap reflects today's momentum, not the long-term picture.

Full data
Strategic Command WWII: World at War →
Full data
Total War: WARHAMMER III →
Verdict
Is Strategic Command WWII: World at War still alive? →
Verdict
Is Total War: WARHAMMER III still alive? →